CE members banned

**AlexCambridge** · Oct 2nd, 2020, 06:46 PM

I see CE models and one of their ladies, Jenna, both Blue on here, were recently banned. I guess they crossed a line, although all I've ever seen either do is defend themselves from lies. More nails in the coffin.

**SP411** · Oct 2nd, 2020 06:46 PM

**sexiijane2017** · Oct 2nd, 2020, 07:36 PM

Originally Posted by AlexCambridge

I see CE models and one of their ladies, Jenna, both Blue on here, were recently banned. I guess they crossed a line, although all I've ever seen either do is defend themselves from lies. More nails in the coffin.

They were banned because they were warned multiple times that they needed to pay their fee. They said they were going to and understood they couldnt participate until they did. Therefore they were banned.

It is not fair to the ladies who pay to be here to have other girls posting who have not paid. Defending yourself in a review is a form of advertising. If and when they pay ; the ban will be lifted.

It is only 200$ right now for a membership if they are referred by another red/ pink investor/ advertiser ; i am not sure why they are not taking advantage of this.

**AlexCambridge** · Oct 2nd, 2020, 09:27 PM

Originally Posted by sexiijane2017

They were banned because they were warned multiple times that they needed to pay their fee. They said they were going to and understood they couldnt participate until they did. Therefore they were banned.

It is not fair to the ladies who pay to be here to have other girls posting who have not paid. Defending yourself in a review is a form of advertising. If and when they pay ; the ban will be lifted.

It is only 200$ right now for a membership if they are referred by another red/ pink investor/ advertiser ; i am not sure why they are not taking advantage of this.

I understand your perspective.
Too bad the place became like this. There used to be lots if SPs and none had to pay.

**sexiijane2017** · Oct 2nd, 2020, 09:49 PM

Originally Posted by AlexCambridge

I understand your perspective.
Too bad the place became like this. There used to be lots if SPs and none had to pay.

As far as I know.. u always had to pay to be an advertiser on this site..
If i am wrong someone please correct me.

**perfection** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 06:32 AM

Originally Posted by AlexCambridge

I understand your perspective.
Too bad the place became like this. There used to be lots if SPs and none had to pay.

You have always had to pay.

**TheOtherGuy** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 07:38 AM

Originally Posted by sexiijane2017

.
Defending yourself in a review is a form of advertising.

Wow... That is um... Illegal. Good thing the amount of money involved is low so lawyers don't get involved.

I honestly don't give a shit about CE (never used em, never will) but holy shit saying you need to pay in order to defend yourself against slanderous posts crosses yet another line by the admins of this forum.

If they are saying come on down and I'll prove it, sure they are trying to get business. Simply saying a comment is untrue and providing the other side is not.

It sounds like that saying about small people with small amounts of power...

**sexiijane2017** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 07:53 AM

Originally Posted by TheOtherGuy

Wow... That is um... Illegal. Good thing the amount of money involved is low so lawyers don't get involved.

I honestly don't give a shit about CE (never used em, never will) but holy shit saying you need to pay in order to defend yourself against slanderous posts crosses yet another line by the admins of this forum.

If they are saying come on down and I'll prove it, sure they are trying to get business. Simply saying a comment is untrue and providing the other side is not.

It sounds like that saying about small people with small amounts of power...

Their avatar itself is a form of advertising.
I also dont understand why you blues are continuously questioning admins / mods decisions on this site when we are the people who make the site run alot smoother.

When I was not a member (blue ) and I have explained this several times before; I could not post until I paid. If I did post all my posts were deleted and I was banned. When I made my payment my ban was lifted . There is no reason CE MODELS can not pay especially if they are an agency and doing well.

You guys need to realize the mods and admins don't make the rules @CHASE does. If you guys have a problem with how things are run around here you can take it up with him instead of attacking mods.

Bottom line is they were warned multiple times by MULTIPLE admins that they needed to pay. They also inboxed me asking me how to pay.. The thing is they never paid but kept posting. Therefore they were banned.

**TheMouse** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 09:27 AM

Originally Posted by sexiijane2017

Their avatar itself is a form of advertising.
I also dont understand why you blues are continuously questioning admins / mods decisions on this site when we are the people who make the site run alot smoother.

When I was not a member (blue ) and I have explained this several times before; I could not post until I paid. If I did post all my posts were deleted and I was banned. When I made my payment my ban was lifted . There is no reason CE MODELS can not pay especially if they are an agency and doing well.

You guys need to realize the mods and admins don't make the rules @CHASE does. If you guys have a problem with how things are run around here you can take it up with him instead of attacking mods.

Bottom line is they were warned multiple times by MULTIPLE admins that they needed to pay. They also inboxed me asking me how to pay.. The thing is they never paid but kept posting. Therefore they were banned.

Blue SP's should not be allowed to be here at all and after a month if not registered as a Red then banned until they do.
Just think of the trash and riff raff that would be here it they were allowed. It would be as bad as trashy OP's or Unregistered posters. Worse yet it would be like Leolist.
M

**Delroy Lee** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 10:13 AM

If sexworkers have to pay to defend their actions, why not blues for saying positive things about non-advertisers?

**thebopper** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 10:55 AM

Nope... they always sound silly when they come on here to defend themselves anyway. And 90% of the time plaintiff is correct anyway. This is review board least we forget. The legitimate advertising benefit is more market saturation.

Originally Posted by Delroy Lee

If sexworkers have to pay to defend their actions, why not blues for saying positive things about non-advertisers?

**AlexCambridge** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 12:17 PM

For sure they should be allowed to defend themselves, but arguably there is a degree of advertising in doing so. So a slippery slope that shouldn't be crossed as not fair to the paying SPs as Jane said. A quick defence when needed has been allowed and is fair imo.
And as much as I don't always agree with some of the post removals by the current group of admins, as a group they are far better than when there was a group of mostly blues acting out with childish vendettas.

**AlexCambridge** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 12:19 PM

Originally Posted by perfection

You have always had to pay.

My bad. I wasn't sure.

**norbert** · Oct 3rd, 2020, 12:31 PM

Welp - with a contrary opinion- once upon a time SPs were allowed to post in threads that were about them - either to say thanks or defend theirselves- they could post in other non- review threads also if they liked as long as they weren't soliciting - which would include avatars that had advertising -AND- SP's were never ever supposed to post in reviews that weren't about them - even if - especially if - they were paid advertisers - there was also a section for reviews and a section for advertisers - they merged and that was the begining of teh end as near as I can tell

**thebopper** · Oct 4th, 2020, 07:40 AM

You are right. I have been on here since pretty much day one and I don't remember any blue SP freebees.

Originally Posted by sexiijane2017

As far as I know.. u always had to pay to be an advertiser on this site..
If i am wrong someone please correct me.

**TheOtherGuy** · Oct 5th, 2020, 12:15 PM

Originally Posted by sexiijane2017

Their avatar itself is a form of advertising.
I also dont understand why you blues are continuously questioning admins / mods decisions on this site when we are the people who make the site run alot smoother.

When I was not a member (blue ) and I have explained this several times before; I could not post until I paid. If I did post all my posts were deleted and I was banned. When I made my payment my ban was lifted . There is no reason CE MODELS can not pay especially if they are an agency and doing well.

You guys need to realize the mods and admins don't make the rules @CHASE does. If you guys have a problem with how things are run around here you can take it up with him instead of attacking mods.

Bottom line is they were warned multiple times by MULTIPLE admins that they needed to pay. They also inboxed me asking me how to pay.. The thing is they never paid but kept posting. Therefore they were banned.

ad·ver·tise
/ˈadvərˌtīz/
Learn to pronounce
verb
gerund or present participle: advertising
describe or draw attention to (a product, service, or event) in a public medium in order to promote sales or attendance.
"a billboard advertising beer"

You need to learn what advertising is, defending yourself is not brining attention go a product or service, that was already done by the initial post/review. Also, just cause CHASE says something doesn't actually make it right. They have proven time and again they don't give a fuck about right or wrong just what they can get away with.

Ban away if you want. Just don't feed me a line of bullshit to justify it.

**sexiijane2017** · Oct 5th, 2020, 12:56 PM

Originally Posted by TheOtherGuy

ad·ver·tise
/ˈadvərˌtīz/
Learn to pronounce
verb
gerund or present participle: advertising
describe or draw attention to (a product, service, or event) in a public medium in order to promote sales or attendance.
"a billboard advertising beer"

You need to learn what advertising is, defending yourself is not brining attention go a product or service, that was already done by the initial post/review. Also, just cause CHASE says something doesn't actually make it right. They have proven time and again they don't give a fuck about right or wrong just what they can get away with.

Ban away if you want. Just don't feed me a line of bullshit to justify it.

Again. If you guys have a problem with the rules. Take it up with @CHASE. They were here without paying for almost a month... they told me and others they were going to pay and didn't.

As I've said before , it is unfair to all the ladies who pay to be here to have another escort posting . They could inbox , defend themselves , why should they get a free ride when the rest of us don't?

BTW. What would I ban you for ??? Smh. You guys need to stop attacking mods. Seriously.

**TheOtherGuy** · Oct 5th, 2020, 01:07 PM

Originally Posted by sexiijane2017

Again. If you guys have a problem with the rules. Take it up with @CHASE. They were here without paying for almost a month... they told me and others they were going to pay and didn't.

As I've said before , it is unfair to all the ladies who pay to be here to have another escort posting . They could inbox , defend themselves , why should they get a free ride when the rest of us don't?

BTW. What would I ban you for ??? Smh. You guys need to stop attacking mods. Seriously.

You were the one trying to tell me that defending oneself equates advertising. That isn't chase.

If you simply say "Sp's cannot post unless that have a paid membership" fine, that's the rule, no argument. Once you start justifying the rule stating that defending yourself is advertising then I call bullshit.

Next time just keep it simple. State the rule, don't justify.

**blaclbill** · Oct 5th, 2020, 01:48 PM

Originally Posted by TheOtherGuy

Wow... That is um... Illegal. Good thing the amount of money involved is low so lawyers don't get involved.

I honestly don't give a shit about CE (never used em, never will) but holy shit saying you need to pay in order to defend yourself against slanderous posts crosses yet another line by the admins of this forum.

If they are saying come on down and I'll prove it, sure they are trying to get business. Simply saying a comment is untrue and providing the other side is not.

It sounds like that saying about small people with small amounts of power...

If any sp wants to use sp411 form's they have to pay ,there is nothing free in life all the other pinks pay for that privilege i don't see anything illegal about that

**TheOtherGuy** · Oct 5th, 2020, 02:07 PM

The pay to post is not illegal. The public justification that the policy is intended to prevent advertising and that defending yourself equates advertising makes it illegal.

**TheMouse** · Oct 5th, 2020, 02:13 PM

KISS.........when you get down to it, in order for an SP to have a voice here, she is required to pay a membership fee. She gets away with joining as a Blue member and should not even in that first post give an explanation of who she is or what she does and put out a bit of a profile or ad. She should just join and then an Administrator should in a kind way, mention that in order to post here and have all of the benefits that SP's have here, she is required to talk to Sharon. If not her name should be deleted. Or Chase should nominate a Sargent at Arms to look after this. Nothing like Sons of Anarchy, just calmly.
M

Michelle · Oct 6th, 2020, 03:31 AM

IIRC Pink status was free for a couple months after BP was taken down but before Leo was established as the new big fish. Either way it's been more than two years, so...