Aly - 8723.

[Liquid]

http://kitchener.backpage.com/Female...-babe/25307114



I was in my home town of KW today as I mostly operate in the GTA and decided to see her as she had good, reliable reviews. All I can say is...wow. This girl looks way better in person than her pictures with a pretty face and a stunning body. Given all my experiences from BP were terrible up to this point, I had really low expectations going in and I was blown away. She starts off with the bbbj, and then switched to doggy. Normally I can last for most of the session, but I finished much more quicker than usual and was quite satisfied. Very friendly, bubbly girl and is not a clock watcher. Will definitely be seeing her again in the near future. The only negative thing that may not sit well with other hobbyists was that she was working out of a crummy motel.

Damage:

100 hh (extra 20 for bbbj).

[BeeCee]

Sure seems to be a lot of brand new members lately posting glowing reviews for tatianna aka Aly aka Rachel aka dr.love aka etc...

2:30am seems kinda late for a hobbyist to be writing a review

[papi69]

I've seen Aly a few times, posted about it and Never had a bad experience yet, with her service or Duo. It's always been Fun times. So, Other than perhaps having to wait a bit when reaching destination, getting a hold of her sometimes might take a little while or having her dog in the room sometimes. ;) Those are a few of the things that she really needs to work on, in My Honest Opinion.

She's pretty Hot, so, I choose to turn the blind eye to those things. ;)

[Liquid]

Sure seems to be a lot of brand new members lately posting glowing reviews for tatianna aka Aly aka Rachel aka dr.love aka etc...

With all due respect, I think you're incredibly confused. This dr.love user may have been a shill, but he was clearly spreading nonsense about Aly and other girls working in the area. I have no affiliation with this user at all, and I'm sure many other trusted users on here that I've exchanged PMs with would vouch for me on that. I've actually been browsing this website since 2012, but only decided to join towards the end of last year. Being accused of being a shill largely did contribute to me not joining for all this time.

2:30am seems kinda late for a hobbyist to be writing a review

Nice logic. Because I have a different schedule and perhaps physiology (night owl) than most hobbyists, that must therefore mean I am a shill?

These shill accusations are getting out of hand. Before long, people will stop taking them serious and real shills will be able to slip under the radar.

[amelio]

Ugh

[sdkad1]

2:30am seems kinda late for a hobbyist to be writing a review

I only take reviews seriously if they are written between 1030AM and 730PM. Otherwise they just don't seem legit to me. I mean, who would be up AND using a computer at any other time? Seriously.

/sarcasm off

[Liquid]

Liquid. Don't sweat it. However. Get some more posts and reviews up here now that you have taken the plunge. I was once accused of being a shill and it Pissed me off. However you get credibility quickly by contributing to the board.

Yep, that's what it looks like one needs to do to start to be taken seriously around here.

[Norman 64]

Sure seems to be a lot of brand new members lately posting glowing reviews for tatianna aka Aly aka Rachel aka dr.love aka etc...

2:30am seems kinda late for a hobbyist to be writing a review

I work 3 rotating shifts.So if I happen to see a lady on my way into my night shift which is 11pm to 7:30am every 6 weeks,I could quite feasibly write a review between the above stated hours.Would probably be on my 3am lunch break.
I'm sure I'm not the only board member who works shifts.

[thebopper]

Yep, that's what it looks like one needs to do to start to be taken seriously around here.

I hate to admit that but you are probably right. As you can see from the mel thread there unfortunately are people who make it hard for new comers by shilling.

Anyway keep post and hopefully reviewing and welcome to the land of naughty little boys.

[nick007]

"This dr.love user may have been a shill, but he was clearly spreading nonsense about Aly and other girls working in the area."



What "nonsense" are you talking about, Liquid? Be specific.

[varvat0s]

Theres been some undertones as of late claiming that Aly is underage. I've received PMs from more than one person now going out of their way to inform me of that. I assume I'm not the only one getting them.

Personally having met her several times I dont believe it.

[nick007]

Theres been some undertones as of late claiming that Aly is underage. I've received PMs from more than one person now going out of their way to inform me of that. I assume I'm not the only one getting them.

Personally having met her several times I dont believe it.

"Belief" is not proof. If anyone wants to err on the side of caution, they will ask to see photo ID of an SP who appears to be underage. Kelsey one of the pink ladies is upfront with this and has no problem with such a request.

[Liquid]

What "nonsense" are you talking about, Liquid? Be specific.

See varvat0s' post.

Theres been some undertones as of late claiming that Aly is underage. I've received PMs from more than one person now going out of their way to inform me of that. I assume I'm not the only one getting them.

Personally having met her several times I dont believe it.

Same here, simply no way she's under 19. It was nothing more than a libelous rumor spread most likely by a competitor or a john that had a bad experience with her.

[Liquid]

"Belief" is not proof. If anyone wants to err on the side of caution, they will ask to see photo ID of an SP who appears to be underage. Kelsey one of the pink ladies is upfront with this and has no problem with such a request.

A great scientist once said 'extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence'. In this case, there is absolutely zero evidence to support the extraordinary claim that she is underage.

If a person who joins yesterday with one post accuses an SP of being a bbfs provider, would you believe them and 'err on the side of caution'? Maybe an unsubstantiated claim is all you need to take such action, but I imagine rational people need a little more evidence before making such a decision.

[nick007]

A great scientist once said 'extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence'. In this case, there is absolutely zero evidence to support the extraordinary claim that she is underage.

If a person who joins yesterday with one post accuses an SP of being a bbfs provider, would you believe them and 'err on the side of caution'? Maybe an unsubstantiated claim is all you need to take such action, but I imagine rational people need a little more evidence before making such a decision.

The "evidence" you require would mean outing an SP (underage or not). Is this what you are suggesting? Also, the "extraordinary" claim that some of these young SPs are underage is not so extraordinary.

Please don't muddy the waters by talking about BBFS and taking my words out of context. I said if you want to err on the side of caution you can ask an SP for proof of age, and there are some SPs like Kelsey who will provide it willingly. If you are going to quote me, at least quote me accurately.

Proof is not asking "what year were you born?". SPs lying about their age? Gambling at Rick's? Shocking...shocking I say.

What next? Ask her who was Canada's first Prime Minister? When did the Leafs last win the Stanley Cup? Hey, maybe she isn't even Canadian.

And you know what? I bet her name isn't even Rachel, Adrianna or Aly.

Just a hunch.

Personally, I will never see an SP who claims to be 20 or younger. I think that is the "rational" and mature thing to do.

[519monger]

I saw aly last year when her name was something else and the claim was Polish at that time. Was good service in the end.but she did say we agreed on a higher rate until i showed her the text. A few months ago she stood me up and stopped responding. But when i did see her it was good

[Liquid]

The "evidence" you require would mean outing an SP (underage or not). Is this what you are suggesting?

That is precisely what I am suggesting.

Also, the "extraordinary" claim that some of these young SPs are underage is not so extraordinary.

Simply because you say so, right? So I should just take your 'word' for it?

and I will just say that I personally will never see an SP who claims to be 20 or younger. I think that is the "rational" and mature thing to do.

Good for you, but please don't project your desires and standards onto me. You can do whatever the hell you want and justify your choices as much as you like, but it doesn't amount to anything of real substance until you can actually support them with credible facts.

So someone asked her what year she was born and she said 1994 without missing a beat? And that is empirical evidence? All that tells me is she finished Grade 10 Math and knows that 2014-20=1994.

Impeccable attention to detail. That was not Aly, but rather Lia. Keep it up, you really are doing a good job at convincing others that it is you who understands the reality at hand.

SPs lying about their age? Gambling at Rick's? Preposterous. And you know what? I bet her name isn't even Rachel, Adrianna or Aly.

And where exactly did I say SPs don't lie about their age? I'm sure they do. However, given the statistically low prevalence of under-aged prostitution as reported by the police and these being predominant amongst human trafficking cases, it becomes an extraordinary claim that needs to be backed with hard evidence once some unknown person to the community makes the claim that a well-reviewed SP is under-aged.

I won't reply to this thread again

Good, don't let the door hit you on way your out.

[TrenT.]

I'm usually pretty quick to call out a shill but liquid seems for real.

[nick007]

Hey Liquid...it is real shilly in here. Methinks the shill doth protest too much.

[519monger]

All hail liquid

[nick007]

That is precisely what I am suggesting.



Simply because you say so, right? So I should just take your 'word' for it?



Good for you, but please don't project your desires and standards onto me. You can do whatever the hell you want and justify your choices as much as you like, but it doesn't amount to anything of real substance until you can actually support them with credible facts.




Impeccable attention to detail. That was not Aly, but rather Lia. Keep it up, you really are doing a good job at convincing others that it is you who understands the reality at hand.




And where exactly did I say SPs don't lie about their age? I'm sure they do. However, given the statistically low prevalence of under-aged prostitution as reported by the police and these being predominant amongst human trafficking cases, it becomes an extraordinary claim that needs to be backed with hard evidence once some unknown person to the community makes the claim that a well-reviewed SP is under-aged.



Good, don't let the door hit you on way your out.

So I take it I'm off your Christmas card list?

[blackhawkprince]

Just to thrown in my two cents into this review I was Aly (she was actually going by Rachel) last week and it was great. She responded timely and did not make me wait like some other experiences I had. The service was great and I will be repeating sometime in the future.